Opinions

 

All court opinions may be accessed at no charge via PACER through the "Written Opinions" link on the Reports page. You must, however, have an account to access the report via CM/ECF or PACER.

 

Access to opinions from 1997 to present, that are PDF searchable, unrestricted & unsealed, are also available through the Government Printing Office using the Advanced Search for Government Publications. There is no login required and publications are available free of charge.

Court Opinions Database

The court's provides free access of some opinions, at the discretion of the judges, for the years 1998 to present. The results shown below are automatically displayed for all years, all judges, and all keywords/topics.

A search may be performed using the Search box above, or filtering by year, judge, and/or keyword/topic. To search for more than one judge and/or keywords/topics simultaneously, hold down the Ctrl key (or Command key) and select each item.

Keywords/Topic Date Title Description Judge
Automatic Stay     02/20/2018     Edward Crespin and Janis Crespin     

Plaintiff sought relief from automatic stay to allow the state court to determine the total amount of punitive damages, costs, attorney’s fees, and interest owed by Debtors. The Court created eight new factors to determine whether or not to lift the stay. The Court concluded that there is insufficient cause to modify the automatic stay, because the Court can quickly determine the remaining issues and the claims allowance process is a core bankruptcy function.

 Judge David T. Thuma
Exemptions     01/31/2018     Pedro Mendoza and Sandy M. Armijo     

Debtors moved to reopen their case to schedule a cause of action resulting from a car accident and exempt a post-petition settlement. Trustee objected to the exemption. The Court held that the failure to disclose was not texemphe result of excusable neglect. Therefore, Debtors will not be able to amend their Schedule C.

 Judge David T. Thuma
Abstention, Remand     01/25/2018     Smith & Marrs, Inc., v. Hoskins Family Enterprises Inc., et al     

Debtor removed adversary proceeding from state court, after having filed its main chapter 11 case on the eve of trial. Debtor owned a working interest in oil and gas wells, and had no business operations, cash flow, employees, or bank accounts. Case was remanded under both mandatory and permissive abstention.

 Judge David T. Thuma
Assumption and Rejection     01/09/2018     Edward A. Mazel, Trustee v. Michael Allen Holley     

The Court denied the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to determine that the Purchase of a Business Agreement and Promissory Note is an Executory Contract. The Court found that there were significant fact issues that precluded the Court from deciding whether the Business Agreement and Promissory Note was either an executory contract or merely a financing device.
 

 Judge David T. Thuma
Fraudulent Transfers     01/04/2018     Philip J. Montoya, Trustee v. Richard Lieberman, M.D.     

Court found that Debtor did not receive reasonable equivalent value for a sale of a membership interest and was insolvent during the course of the payments. Most of the payments were clawed back under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B)(ii)(I) and N.M.S.A. § 56-10-19(A).f

 Judge David T. Thuma
Dischargeability, Nondischargeability     12/22/2017     Dennis O'Brien v. Dennis William Montoya     

Court dismissed sec. 523(a)(2)(A) claim because it did not allege that the debtor obtained a benefit from the creditor by the alleged fraud.

 Judge David T. Thuma
Damages, Discharge, Dischargeability, Nondischargeability     12/11/2017     Lujan v. Davide et al     

 Plaintiff, an investor in Defendant's business, brought claims under §§  523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), and (a)(6), seeking to establish that Defendant's loan debt was nondischargeable. The Court found that Plaintiff carried his burden of proof under §  523(a)(2)(A) and Defendant had employed false representations or false pretenses in obtaining Plaintiff's loan. Defendant's loan debt was therefore nondischargeable. Plaintiff failed to prove his claims under §§  523(a)(4) and (a)(6).dama

 Judge David T. Thuma
Property of the Estate, Public Utility, Standing, Trustee, Turnover     12/01/2017     Clarke C. Coll v. Picacho Hills Development Company, Inc.     

Plaintiff, Chapter 7 Trustee, brought a § 542 claim seeking the turnover of funds from Defendant to the bankrupt estate. A portion of the funds at issue had previously been the subject of an administrative turnover order issued by the New Mexico Public Utility Commission; the remaining funds were proceeds from Defendant's sale of estate assets to a third party. On cross motions for summary judgment, the Court found for Plaintiff and ordered that the funds be turned over to Plaintiff.

Judge David T. Thuma
Automatic Stay, Discharge, Dischargeability, Nondischargeability, Relief from Stay     11/21/2017     Jean Marie Torres-Montoya and Dennis William Montoya     

Plaintiff sought stay relief to allow state court litigation to proceed against Defendant. The Court, after analyzing Plaintiff's request for stay relief under In re Curtis, found that the Curtis factors weighed against lifting the automatic stay. In denying Plaintiff's motion, the Court found that state court litigation for malicious abuse of process would not eliminate the necessity of a separate trial in bankruptcy court on the dischargeability of Defendant's judgment debt under §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6).

 Judge David T. Thuma
Jurisdiction, Nondischargeability     11/09/2017     The Estate of Wayne Marshall Coleman v. MIchelle Renee Mladek     

Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to rule on Plaintiff's non-dischargeability complaint and for failure to state a claim was denied. The Court has jurisdiction over the dispute, and also that the compliant sufficiently states a proper claim for relief, with sufficient particularity.
 

 Judge David T. Thuma

Pages