Opinions
All court opinions may be accessed at no charge via PACER through the "Written Opinions" link on the Reports page. You must, however, have an account to access the report via CM/ECF or PACER.
Access to opinions from 1997 to present, that are PDF searchable, unrestricted & unsealed, are also available through the Government Printing Office using the Advanced Search for Government Publications. There is no login required and publications are available free of charge.
Court Opinions Database
The court's provides free access of some opinions, at the discretion of the judges, for the years 1998 to present. The results shown below are automatically displayed for all years, all judges, and all keywords/topics.
A search may be performed using the Search box above, or filtering by year, judge, and/or keyword/topic. To search for more than one judge and/or keywords/topics simultaneously, hold down the Ctrl key (or Command key) and select each item.
Keywords/Topic | Date | Title | Description | Judge | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bankruptcy Petition Preparers | 02/28/2011 | United States Trustee v. McIntire d/b/a The Bankruptcy Store, LLC |
Bankruptcy petition preparer (BPP) who adivised clients whether to elect state or federal exemption scheme gave legal advice in violation of 11 U.S.C. § 110. Injunction issued against BPP prohibiting him from giving legal advice. Court did not enjoin BPP from acting as a BPP under 11 U.S.C. § 110(j)(2)(B). 446 B.R. 531 (Bankr.D.N.M. 2011, J. Jacobvitz). |
Chief Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz | |
Dismissal | 02/15/2011 | Titus William Linville and Shannon Marie Linville |
Dismissal for Abuse - 11 U.S.C. § 707(b). Above median-income debtors whose actual mortgage payment was greater than the IRS local standards could not take both deductions and could not claim college expenses of adult children as an allowable expendse deduction under the means test. Payment of adult children's college expenses did not constitute a "special circumstance" sufficient to rebut the presumption of abuse. Court gives debtors an opportunity to convert to Chapter 13. 446 B.R. 522 (Bankr.D.N.M. 2011, J. Jacobvitz). |
Chief Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz | |
Default Judgment | 02/11/2011 | Blanding v. Mendez (In re Robert R. V. Mendez and Bernadette E. Mendez) |
Rule 56(c), setting aside a default or a default judgment. Defendant must establish three elements. Motion denied, defendant was culpable in not answering and lacked meritorious defense. 444 B.R. 439. |
Judge James Starzynski | |
Dischargeability | 02/11/2011 | Sanchez v. Lovato (In re Rodolfo Lovato and Lisa Lovato) |
Court sua sponte reverses earlier decision on dischargeability, determining that Plaintiffs had not in fact proved proximate cause. 442 B.R. 810. |
Judge James Starzynski | |
Chapter 11 | 02/08/2011 | Robert Joseph Podzemny and 7-H Cattle Feeders, Inc. |
Use of Cash Collateral - Court authorizes debtor in possession to use cash collateral to develop irrigation on new farm; plant, cultivate and harvest crop on existing irrigated farmland; and acquire, graze and care for cattle. 2011 WL 576591 (Bankr.D.N.M. Feb. 8, 2011, J. Jacobvitz). |
Chief Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz | |
Dischargeability | 02/03/2011 | In re James Robert Lancaster III and Nora B. Lancaster |
UST filed motion to dismiss for abuse. Section 727(b). Opinion goes through required calculations and finds excess disposable income. Grants motion. 2011 WL 477854. |
Judge James Starzynski | |
Preference | 01/24/2011 | In re John David Pfiester |
Debtor may not exempt asset recovered as a preference. Issue was whether transfer was voluntary or involuntary. Section 522(g). 449 B.R. 422. |
Judge James Starzynski | |
Summary Judgment | 01/18/2011 | Marcott v. Luna (In re Peter Simon Luna and Kristel Rose Luna) |
Summary judgment granted for Defendants on 523(a)(2)(A) claim. Plaintiff failed to establish misrepresentation and proximate cause. Discusses 523(d). 2011 WL 144906. |
Judge James Starzynski | |
Abstention | 12/14/2010 | Hernandez v. Lasalle Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-12XS |
Court considers both mandatory and permissive abstention statutes. Court exercises permissive abstention over non-core proceeding that questioned the propriety of state court foreclosure action and whether the mortgage company is the holder of the note and mortgage. |
Chief Judge Robert H. Jacobvitz | |
Chapter 11 | 11/30/2010 | In re Market Center East Retail Property, Inc. |
Supplemental Application for costs and fees as part of oversecured claim. Section 506. 442 B.R. 805. |
Judge James Starzynski |